Screening of F1 progeny for selection of superior hybrids in mulberry (Morus spp.) - A simple approach Part II: Screening of transplants in relation to seedling size

Basavaiah *, Daryoush Shafiei

Abstract


In continuation of studies on the effect of seed size on growth, made under part-I, the effect of seed size and seedling size are studied jointly by size-grading of seedlings into three classes under each seed-size class, with 2700 F1 promising genotypes of two crosses. The combined population was screened in two steps, adopting comparison tree method. In step-1, transplanted seedlings (transplants) with closer spacing were screened based on shoot weight for a period of two crops and 487 genotypes were shortlisted based on higher superiority percent. In step-2, these 487 transplants were replanted with wider spacing and screened using three parameters for a period of four crops. In each crop, the genotypes which showed superiority percent value more than Minimum Selection Standard for the parameters studied, were shortlisted. Among 22 genotypes shortlisted finally, 18 have come from large seed-size class and the remaining four are also from long seedling-size class of medium seed-size class. This clearly established the importance of size-grading of seeds and seedlings in screening process. As the chance of getting any promising genotype from small seeds is remote, they could be rejected before sowing and as it is also true with small seedlings they could be rejected at nursery stage screening. The tracking of juvenile performance of shortlisted genotypes indicated that, shoot length and root collar diameter are more reliable parameters for assessing the growth of seedlings at nursery. Comparison tree method is found to be highly useful for shortlisting of transplants in mulberry.


Keywords


Comparison tree method; F1 hybrids; Mulberry breeding; Screening; Seedling size.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baraloto C., P. Forget and D. E. Goldberg. “Seed mass, seedling size and neotropical tree seedling establishment.” Journal of Ecology 93 (2005):1156-1166.

Dorman K. V. “The genetics and breeding of southern pines.” U. S. Dept. Agric. Handb. (1976): 417: 407.

Ellis, R. S. “Seed and seedling vigour in relation to crop growth and yield.” Plant Growth Regulation 11 (1999): 249-255.

Filgueiras T. S. “Seed vigor and productivity.” Pesq. Agropec. Bras. Brasília 16.6 (1981): 851-854.

Haase D. L. “Understanding forest seedling quality: measurements and interpretation.” Tree Planter Notes 52.2 (2008): 24-30.

Kackar N. L., S. K. Jindal and K. R. Solanki. “Tree improvement in indian arid zone. In: Agro forestry for rural needs” D. K. Khurna and P. K. Khosla (Eds), ISTS publication, Solan 3 (1993): 768-771.

Kesavacharyulu K., R. Balakrishna, S. B. Dandin and A. Sarkar. “Development of promising mulberry (Morus SPP.) genotypes for sub-optimal irrigated condition through advanced generation breeding approach.” Indian J. Seric. 45.2 (2006): 155-159.

Khurana E. and J. S. Sing. “Influence of seed size on seedling growth of Albezia procera under different soil water levels.” Annual of Botany 86 (2000):1185-1192.

Mexal J. and T. D. Landis. “Target seedling symposium: height and diameter.” Proceedings, Combined Meeting of Western Forest Nursery Association August 13-17 (1990): 17-35.

Moles A. T. and M. Westoby. “Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature.” J. Ecol. 92 (2004): 372-383.

Pitcher J. A. and D. E. Dorn. “A new form for reporting hardwood superior tree candidates.” Proc. of the fifth Central State Forest Tree Improvement Conference (ed. Kriebel, H. B.) Wooster, Ohio. (1967): 112-115.

Rezapour R., H. Kazemi-arbat, M. Yarnia and P. Zafarani-Moattar, “Effect of seed size on germination and seed vigor of two soybeans (Glycin max L.) cultivars.” International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 4.11 (2013): 3396-3401.

Rai S. N. and K. Parthasarathi. “Present status of forest tree improvement in India.” Indian For. 115 (1989): 603-612.

Sarkar A. “Mulberry breeding.” Kalyani Pub. (2009).

Sidhu D. S. “Selection of plus tree and their progeny testing in Eucalyptus hybrid.” Indian Forester 119 (1993):744-752

Sidhu D. S. “Tree breeding perspective in tropical forestry. In: Tree and tree farming.” P.K. Thampn (Ed.), Tree crops development foundation, Cochin, India (1994).

Sidhu D. S. “Methods of plus tree selection for raising first-generation population for a tree breeding programme.” Indian Forester, 122.6 (1996): 476-485.

Sidhu D. S. “Selection of plus tree for genetic improvement of stem form in Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo).” Indian J. Forestry 20 (1997): 20-25.

Sluder E. R. “The effect of seed and seedling size on survival and growth of Loblolly pine.” Tree Planters Notes 30.4 (1979): 25-28.

Solanki K. R., K. D. Muthana, R. S. Paroda and N. L. Kackar. “Performance of elite tree of Prosopis cineraria in comparison to Acacia tortilis in Western Rajesthan.” Forage Res. 10 (1984): 111-113.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2017.02.006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Bioassays

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Bioassays is a member of the Publishers International Linking Association, Inc. (PILA), CROSSREF and CROSSMARK (USA). Digital Object Identifier (DOI) will be assigned to all its published content.